Vocabulary is constant, but details are lackluster and ineffective. They can make an educators life so much easier because they are able to quickly determine exactly where a students' work excelled, and where it lacked. Not organized, and events make no sense. Rubrics are a fast and easy way to assess students' work. Ignores most suggestions for revision. The topic is remotely related and details are somewhat sketchy and unclear.
Vague about whom the essay is for. Vocabulary is varied, but supporting details are plain and could use work. Follows up on most suggestions for revision. Features Beginning 1 Developed 2 Accomplished 3 Exemplary 4 State objective here 1 Description of the performance and characteristics that reflect a beginning level of performance Description of the performance and characteristics that reflect a development toward performance Description of the performance and characteristics that reflect an accomplished level of performance Description of the performance and characteristics that reflect the highest level performance State objective here 2 State Performance Descriptors Here State objective here 3 State objective here 4. An overall essay plan is evident. Attempted organization does not make much sense, in that events jump around and the start and end are unclear. The use of writing conventions is somewhat effective.
Goals are stated but somewhat vague. Goals are clear and explicit. Topic was directly relevant and all supporting details were specific to subject. Only minor errors are apparent in grammar, spelling, sentence structure and punctuation. Plan for the whole essay somewhat clear. .
Has a plan for the essay. Vocabulary is varied and supporting details are effective. Revisions are a slight improvement over earlier draft. Made only a minimal attempt to revise, if at all. There are several errors in punctuation, spelling, sentence structure and grammar. The topic is totally unrelated, and the reader is unable to find specific details.
Topic was mostly relevant and supporting details are mostly specific to subject. Essay is organized, but events are somewhat jumpy. Major errors in the use of writing conventions obscure meaning. Makes sense for the most part. Writing shows no evidence of planning. Vocabulary is varied and supporting details are vivid Good organization, with most events logically ordered. Topic was somewhat relevant and some details are non-supporting to the subject.
Goals are very clear and explicit. All grammar, sentence structure, punctuation and spelling are correct and neat The use of writing conventions is effective. Addresses some but not all suggested revisions. Revisions improve on the previous draft. Revisions are a definite improvement. Revisions made do not improve the earlier draft. To make it a little bit easier for you, all you have to do is use the samples below.
While they are a great tool to have, creating them can be quite time-consuming. Very frequent errors in punctuation, spelling, grammar, and sentence structure make understanding difficult. . . .
. . . . . . .